Ubuntu Software Centre 3.0
Didn't see that one coming, did you?
During their press conference the other day, Apple announced their new Mac App Store. While it may seem to be the first centralized app store for a desktop operating system, it actually isn't the first. Apple would be the first company to make an app store well known though. I'll explain.
For years, Linux distributions have used package management. Package Management is a system where you can use an application or utility to search for, download, and then install applications. The package management system also handles software updates. In more detail, all linux distributions have repositories (servers, and other servers mirroring their contents). The package manager allows one to search for software, it'll automatically search for and select other pieces of software that it depends on, download, and then install it.
Back in late 2009, Ubuntu replaced their previous add/remove software application with the Ubuntu Software Centre. Since then, it has gained the ability to show additionally added repositories (PPAs), handle installer files (this was previously handled by the gdebi application), showing related applications and add-ons, and to purchase software.
![]() |
| Thunderbird entry in the Ubuntu Software Centre |
Now, on to the recently announced Mac App Store.
![]() |
| * |
Now, the App Store for the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad have gotten flack for having a funky approval process with lots of restrictions. On those devices, the App Store is the only way to get apps onto the device without jailbreaking the device. Similarly, the Mac App Store also has restrictions, although here you don't need the App Store to get applications.
There are quite a few restrictions that will cause an app to get rejected from the Mac App Store. Here are just some that stand out to me:
- It is a demo or a trial.
- It duplicates the functionality of other apps in the store.
- It is not packaged using Xcode.
- It has metadata that mentions the name of any other computer platform (Is this not anticompetitive or what?)
- It looks similar to Apple applications.
- It changes user interface elements or behaviours of Mac OS X.
- Your game portrays realistic images of people or animals being killed or maimed, shot, stabbed, tortured, or injured. Your game portrays realistic images of people or animals being killed or maimed, shot, stabbed, tortured, or injured. Your game portrays realistic images of people or animals being killed or maimed, shot, stabbed, tortured, or injured. (That eliminates Resident Evil 4, any Legend Of Zelda game since A Link To The Past, if jumping on mushroom-based enemies count then that takes out just about every Mario platformer game in existence. Need I go on?)
* Image taken from apple.ca





No comments:
Post a Comment